Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,259 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 763 hits . Analysis detected 3,233 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,036 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,669 of 37,536 keywords). This Charles is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Charles
Keyword details
Total words: 5,036
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst