Keyword summary
29% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Central Valley results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 1,412 hits . Analysis detected 16,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,833 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (33,146 of 35,635 keywords). This Central Valley is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group. Central Valley
Keyword details
Total words: 24,833
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles24.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst