Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Central Park results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 672 hits . Analysis detected 4,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,201 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,825 keywords). This Central Park is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Central Park
Keyword details
Total words: 6,201
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst