Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,522 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Central Intelligence Agency results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 696 hits . Analysis detected 4,436 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,086 of 37,536 keywords). This Central Intelligence Agency is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Central Intelligence Agency
Keyword details
Total words: 6,088
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst