Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celine Dion results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 624 hits. Analysis detected 3,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,043 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,429 of 37,536 keywords). This Celine Dion is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Celine Dion
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
41%Celine Dion (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,043
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510040.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.4%5.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos