Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Weddings results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 1,018 hits . Analysis detected 6,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,676 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (18,363 of 35,856 keywords). This Celebrity Weddings is better (less manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group. Celebrity Weddings
Keyword details
Total words: 6,676
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst