Keyword summary
25% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,700 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Deaths And Obituaries results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 2,081 hits . Analysis detected 8,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,478 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (30,778 of 37,536 keywords). This Celebrity Deaths And Obituaries is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. Celebrity Deaths And Obituaries
Keyword details
Total words: 11,478
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst