Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 570 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cannibalism results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 729 hits . Analysis detected 3,591 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,416 of 37,536 keywords). This Cannibalism is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group. Cannibalism
Keyword details
Total words: 2,280
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.9% percentile 7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 32.0% 32.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.8% 17.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 21.1% 21.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 32.0%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Special Pleading: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst