Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canada Border Services Agency results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 684 hits . Analysis detected 3,971 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,599 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (29,470 of 34,495 keywords). This Canada Border Services Agency is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group. Canada Border Services Agency
Keyword details
Total words: 6,599
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst