Keyword summary
83% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,023 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaigning results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 2,796 hits . Analysis detected 17,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,235 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,213 of 37,536 keywords). This Campaigning is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group. Campaigning
Keyword details
Total words: 11,235
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst