Keyword summary
62%2 analyzed articles/videos805 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Camden County results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 239 hits. Analysis detected 1,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,220 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 42% (32,808 of 56,449 keywords). This Camden County is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Camden County
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
42%Camden County (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,220
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

42% percentile
025507510041.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos