Keyword summary
26% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,480 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Election results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 1,732 hits . Analysis detected 13,204 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,842 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (34,667 of 35,712 keywords). This California Election is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. California Election
Keyword details
Total words: 23,842
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles23.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst