Keyword summary
37% 5 analyzed articles/videos 7,913 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Coastal Commission results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 1,899 hits . Analysis detected 20,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,856 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,451 of 37,536 keywords). This California Coastal Commission is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group. California Coastal Commission
Keyword details
Total words: 26,856
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles26.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst