Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cahokia Heights results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 632 hits . Analysis detected 6,508 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,430 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (31,998 of 35,101 keywords). This Cahokia Heights is better (less manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group. Cahokia Heights
Keyword details
Total words: 10,430
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst