STLPR0%

Cahokia school district union rejects proposed contract by wide margin 14%

By Will Bauer0%

6/30/2026, 9:17:52 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 448 faulty-reasoning hits from 502 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.9% and a BS Rank of 14% (17,618 of 20,453 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the article peer group.

The Cahokia Federation of Teachers voted down a tentative agreement that the union’s bargaining team and the school district reached earlier this month. 
Nearly two-thirds of the union that’s made up of teachers, service employees and secretaries rejected the terms of the four-year contract, said Ray Roskos, the field service director at the Illinois Federation of Teachers, who’s been assisting with negotiations. 
“The district needs to do better. 
That’s what the membership, I think, has told them,” Roskos said of the vote. 
In final results Monday, 137 union members voted against the proposal, while 70 voted for it. 
A 5% increase in the baseline salary on the union’s pay scale and an additional $1,000 for employees’ medical insurance plans proved to be sticking points. 
Union members believed they weren’t enough, especially if insurance premiums keep getting more expensive, Roskos said. 
Currently, there are 80 open teaching positions across the district, and the union would like their positions to be more competitive to peer districts, Roskos said. 
The change to the pay schedule means that only the bottom<b> </b>increases by 5% and that more tenured teachers would see smaller yearly raises. 
“This contract should be about retaining and recruiting teachers,” Roskos said. 
“We heard overwhelmingly at our membership meetings that this contract doesn't do nearly enough to recruit and retain the professional teachers that they have and that they want to attract.” 
The rebuke means the union and Cahokia School District will either return to the bargaining table under federal mediation or the two parties will take steps toward declaring an impasse. 
If an impasse is declared, both parties would be required to post their best and final offers on the Illinois Educational Relations Board’s website, so the public can see where they stand. 
“We believe we should be back at the table,” Roskos said. 
“Our membership didn't approve the contract, and we should let them know what the hot topics are and go from there.” 
Superintendent Curtis McCall Jr. said in a statement on Tuesday evening that the school district will implement its final offer reached at the start of June, declare an impasse and focus on negotiating a new contract. 
The unionized employees of the district worked without a new contract for the entire 2025-26 school year. 
Other proposals that required teachers to make lesson plans available to the principal once a week and eliminated language preventing administrators from raising salaries at greater rates than what is offered to union members are also problems for his members, Roskos said. 
The ongoing contraction negotiations have come as the union made corruption allegations against administrators. 
As bargaining stalled earlier this year, union leadership alleged that, for years, multiple employees were being paid without evidence of working and the assistant superintendent was paid far above his contracted salary. 
The union also claimed the district paid for an employee’s supplemental Medicare coverage without what it considers proper documentation. 
McCall has consistently denied the union’s allegations. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias7.8%This article: 5.2%Will Bauer: 2.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 15.5%Will Bauer: 4.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect15.5%This article: 3.2%Will Bauer: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion3.2%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 8.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 17.3%Will Bauer: 4.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias17.3%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Will Bauer: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect1.4%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem6.4%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 6.0%Will Bauer: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma6.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.0%Will Bauer: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization6.0%This article: 2.8%Will Bauer: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring2.8%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 5.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 2.2%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question2.2%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.4%Will Bauer: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.4%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.2%Will Bauer: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection1.2%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

502 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers42%attributed speech289writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageRay Roskos • 6 words • 100.0% coverageRay Roskos • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageRay Roskos • 16 words • 0.0% coverageRay Roskos • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageRay Roskos • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRay Roskos • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageRay Roskos • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRay Roskos • 21 words • 0.0% coverageCurtis McCall Jr. • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageRay Roskos • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ray Roskos

74%flagged-word coverage
177 attributed words83% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Quote-first Misdirection+3.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ray Roskos: 3.4%3.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.