Keyword summary
â 38% 1 analyzed article/video 554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Burn Centers In South Carolina results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 181 hits . Analysis detected 1,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of â 70% (17,063 of 56,751 keywords). This Burn Centers In South Carolina is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Burn Centers In South Carolina
Keyword details
Total words: 2,216
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.9% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst