Keyword summary
⁠16%2 analyzed articles/videos1,291 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Burger results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 850 hits. Analysis detected 2,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,930 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (37,296 of 37,536 keywords). This Burger is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Burger
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠1%Burger (selected)1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,930
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751000.6% percentile
0.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos