Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Budget Resolution results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 804 hits. Analysis detected 4,816 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,048 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Budget Resolution is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Budget Resolution
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Budget Resolution (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,048
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos