Keyword summary
44% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bread results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 730 hits . Analysis detected 5,164 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,607 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (26,624 of 37,326 keywords). This Bread is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Bread
Keyword details
Total words: 7,607
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst