Keyword summary
46% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,069 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boston City Council results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 519 hits . Analysis detected 5,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,207 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (34,704 of 37,536 keywords). This Boston City Council is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. Boston City Council
Keyword details
Total words: 9,207
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst