Keyword summary
9%1 analyzed article/video1,283 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blood results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 2,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,849 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (26,370 of 36,204 keywords). This Blood is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Blood
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
28%Blood (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,849
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

27% percentile
025507510027.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos