Keyword summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,932 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biosecurity results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 1,836 hits . Analysis detected 15,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,782 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (15,408 of 35,868 keywords). This Biosecurity is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group. Biosecurity
Keyword details
Total words: 10,782
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.0% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst