Keyword summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video688 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Big Pharma results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 376 hits. Analysis detected 2,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (23,992 of 55,382 keywords). This Big Pharma is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Big Pharma
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠57%Big Pharma (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,752
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos