Keyword summary
22% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,035 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bicyclists results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 313 hits . Analysis detected 2,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,140 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (29,507 of 37,533 keywords). This Bicyclists is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Bicyclists
Keyword details
Total words: 4,140
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst