Keyword summary
72% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Berkeley City Council results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 927 hits . Analysis detected 5,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,184 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (21,892 of 35,224 keywords). This Berkeley City Council is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group. Berkeley City Council
Keyword details
Total words: 7,184
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst