Keyword summary
72%2 analyzed articles/videos2,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Berkeley City Council results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 927 hits. Analysis detected 5,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,184 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (21,892 of 35,224 keywords). This Berkeley City Council is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Berkeley City Council
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
38%Berkeley City Council (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,184
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510037.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos