Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,251 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bella Hadid results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 2,112 hits. Analysis detected 10,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,004 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,706 of 37,536 keywords). This Bella Hadid is worse (more manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group.
Bella Hadid
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
53%Bella Hadid (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,004
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510052.8% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 23.5%23.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos