Keyword summary
43%2 analyzed articles/videos292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bedfordshire Police results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 253 hits. Analysis detected 2,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,748 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (18,710 of 35,923 keywords). This Bedfordshire Police is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Bedfordshire Police
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
48%Bedfordshire Police (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,748
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510047.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos