Keyword summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,805 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ballot Initiatives results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,170 hits. Analysis detected 6,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,354 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (35,811 of 37,536 keywords). This Ballot Initiatives is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group.
Ballot Initiatives
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
5%Ballot Initiatives (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,354
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751004.6% percentile
1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate