STLPR0%

Missouri congressional redistricting opponents may have enough signatures for statewide vote 4%

By Jason Rosenbaum0%

3/23/2026, 1:24:39 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 235 faulty-reasoning hits from 410 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 16.9% and a BS Rank of 4% (21,162 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the article peer group.

A group seeking to place Missouri’s new congressional redistricting plan up for a statewide vote said Monday it’s surpassed the minimum number of signatures needed to get it on the ballot. 
People Not Politicians launched the referendum campaign shortly after the Missouri legislature passed a new map aimed at flipping the seat of Democratic Congressman Emanuel Cleaver of Kansas City. 
The group announced that based on data from Secretary of State Denny Hoskins’ office, it has enough signatures to put the referendum on the November ballot. 
Hoskins’ preliminary petition signature county report that was released on Monday found that People Not Politicians reached the required number of signatures in Missouri’s 7th Congressional District  the final one needed. 
The count does not include roughly 100,000 signatures that are currently being argued over in Cole County Court. 
The group has said it collected more than 300,000 signatures, well above the roughly 100,000 needed. 
“Today’s confirmation is a decisive victory for democracy and for the people of Missouri,” People Not Politicians’ Richard von Glahn said in a statement. 
“Volunteers across the state didn’t just meet the bar, they shattered it, sending a clear message that voters will not stand for politicians rigging the rules mid-game.” 
Hoskins’ office has said the numbers in the report are preliminary and don’t take into account duplicate signatures, incomplete information or other factors that may affect certification totals. 
And the report has a disclaimer saying it’s “provided for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as a final determination regarding petition validity or certification.” 
“Final determinations will be made only after the Missouri Secretary of State completes the full verification and certification process required under Missouri law,” the report states. 
Hoskins has until early August to determine whether the referendum qualified for the ballot. 
People Not Politicians’ announcement comes as both sides of the redistricting debate are awaiting decisions in two legal cases. 
Cole County Judge Brian Stumpe is weighing whether the submission of the signatures prevented the new map from going into effect  which would mean the previous plan that contains a safe Democratic district for Cleaver would be active for the 2026 election cycle. 
And the Missouri Supreme Court could soon decide whether lawmakers had the right to redraw congressional lines in the middle of the decade. 
Cole County Judge Christopher Limbaugh ruled legislators were authorized to create the map last year. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias5.9%This article: 19.5%Jason Rosenbaum: 8.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect19.5%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 6.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem6.6%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 4.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.4%Jason Rosenbaum: 7.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion12.4%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.1%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice7.1%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

410 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers19%attributed speech333writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageRichard von Glahn • 24 words • 0.0% coverageRichard von Glahn • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMissouri Secretary of State • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Richard von Glahn

100%flagged-word coverage
51 attributed words66% of attributed speech8.7% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.7 ptsWriter: 8.7%Richard von Glahn: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.