Keyword summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 6,692 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Redistricting results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 3,134 hits . Analysis detected 20,685 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,811 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (32,082 of 35,865 keywords). This Missouri Redistricting is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Missouri Redistricting
Keyword details
Total words: 27,811
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score9 analyzed articles27.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst