Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Baby Swap results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 286 hits. Analysis detected 1,633 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,715 of 37,536 keywords). This Baby Swap is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.
Baby Swap
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
40%Baby Swap (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,648
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510039.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.3%9.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos