Keyword summary
14%3 analyzed articles/videos3,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Automakers results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,105 hits. Analysis detected 5,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,133 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,304 of 37,323 keywords). This Automakers is better (less manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Automakers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
14%Automakers (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,133
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510013.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate