Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Australian Lifestyle results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Anecdotal , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,152 hits . Analysis detected 5,654 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,668 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,451 of 37,536 keywords). This Australian Lifestyle is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Australian Lifestyle
Keyword details
Total words: 7,668
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst