Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 764 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rosamund Brennan results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Optimism Bias , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 298 hits . Analysis detected 1,623 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,909 of 6,628 authors). This Rosamund Brennan is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group. Rosamund Brennan
Author details
Total words: 2,292
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.1% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 13.0% 13.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.2% 6.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 13.0%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst