Keyword summary
4% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,634 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin Police Department results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 1,207 hits . Analysis detected 5,321 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,510 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (28,575 of 35,923 keywords). This Austin Police Department is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group. Austin Police Department
Keyword details
Total words: 8,510
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst