Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aurora Borealis results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 735 hits . Analysis detected 4,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,200 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (18,825 of 36,204 keywords). This Aurora Borealis is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. Aurora Borealis
Keyword details
Total words: 5,200
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst