Keyword summary
83% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Attribution Science results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 1,594 hits . Analysis detected 13,529 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,074 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,918 of 37,536 keywords). This Attribution Science is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group. Attribution Science
Keyword details
Total words: 10,074
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst