Keyword summary
56%4 analyzed articles/videos1,029 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Assimilation results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 2,230 hits. Analysis detected 24,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,880 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (25,346 of 34,833 keywords). This Assimilation is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Assimilation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
28%Assimilation (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 22,880
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

27% percentile
025507510027.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles22.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate