Keyword summary
67%3 analyzed articles/videos1,277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Asia Economy results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 791 hits. Analysis detected 3,902 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,565 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,983 of 37,536 keywords). This Asia Economy is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Asia Economy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
50%Asia Economy (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,565
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510049.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos