Keyword summary
83%4 analyzed articles/videos3,863 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artifical Intelligence results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 3,443 hits. Analysis detected 24,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,797 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (13,936 of 37,536 keywords). This Artifical Intelligence is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Artifical Intelligence
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
63%Artifical Intelligence (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 14,797
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510062.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 23.3%23.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.1%14.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 11.9%11.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate