Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artemisia Gentileschi results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 983 hits . Analysis detected 5,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,420 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,813 of 37,536 keywords). This Artemisia Gentileschi is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Artemisia Gentileschi
Keyword details
Total words: 8,420
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst