Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deborah Nicholls-Lee results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , In-Group Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 348 hits . Analysis detected 1,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,897 of 6,628 authors). This Deborah Nicholls-Lee is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Deborah Nicholls-Lee
Author details
Total words: 2,776
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.5% 12.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 12.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Personal Incredulity: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst