Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anorexia results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 1,363 hits. Analysis detected 8,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (11,151 of 37,536 keywords). This Anorexia is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Anorexia
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
71%Anorexia (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 25.3%25.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.9%17.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos