Keyword summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ann Arbor results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 380 hits. Analysis detected 2,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,947 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (8,037 of 37,536 keywords). This Ann Arbor is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Ann Arbor
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠79%Ann Arbor (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,947
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510078.6% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 19.5%19.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 10.7%10.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos