Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,247 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 2,287 hits. Analysis detected 14,998 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,387 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,428 of 37,536 keywords). This Animal is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Animal
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
57%Animal (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,387
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510056.2% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 20.1%20.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 13.8%13.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos