Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Cuomo results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 1,704 hits. Analysis detected 9,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,199 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (18,860 of 34,423 keywords). This Andrew Cuomo is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Andrew Cuomo
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
46%Andrew Cuomo (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,199
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510045.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 20.8%20.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate