Keyword summary
â 37% 17 analyzed articles/videos 19,592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Coney Barrett results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 10,532 hits . Analysis detected 71,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 86,148 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of â 11% (33,416 of 37,536 keywords). This Amy Coney Barrett is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group. Amy Coney Barrett
Keyword details
Total words: 86,148
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score17 analyzed articles86.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst