Keyword summary
42%8 analyzed articles/videos519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanpour And Company results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 379 hits. Analysis detected 2,105 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,557 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,888 of 37,536 keywords). This Amanpour And Company is worse (more manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group.
Amanpour And Company
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
85%Amanpour And Company (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,557
Article count: 8
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510084.3% percentile
5.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.9%16.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 24.3%24.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.8%4.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate