Keyword summary
⁠7%4 analyzed articles/videos2,555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alcatraz results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 430 hits. Analysis detected 3,672 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (36,216 of 37,536 keywords). This Alcatraz is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group.
Alcatraz

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751003.5% percentile
1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos