Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,824 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ahmad Al Sharaa results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,543 hits . Analysis detected 10,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,296 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,772 of 37,536 keywords). This Ahmad Al Sharaa is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. Ahmad Al Sharaa
Keyword details
Total words: 15,296
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst